http://kuninkaanera.fi/fi/component/mailto/?tmpl=component exam answers questions acc 206
Recent Updates Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts
http://chinovalleyenews.com/?nawa=opzioni-binarie-investimento-minimo-1-euro opzioni binarie investimento minimo 1 euro
http://fysiotopics.nl/pagina/aanmelden swiss binäre optionen
http://animecontent.com/?margaret=soc-304-week-2-assignment&06c=4f soc 304 week 2 assignment • We want to be able to track technical assistance/help requests by site
• Each request would be a case
• There are multiple sites. Each site has a lead agency and its own partners
• We want to track solutions or responses
• The lead agency is responsible for a set of outcomes that are based on a set of overall competencies (fundraising, early learning, health, et.). We’d like to tag requests by the competency areas.
• At this point, it is just PolicyLink staff that has access so no permissions and security is not an issue. We may decide that we want to have sites have access to their own TA Hub section in the future so that is a consideration.
essay on helping someone in trouble “We badly need change. Change labs are springing up around the world. Mission accomplished? Not so fast. Although building prototypes is exciting, and launching a start-up is a buzz, transforming a system is something else again. Are we confusing frantic activity with the achievement of meaningful change? Does churning out start-ups address the symptoms, but not the lasting root causes, of the challenges we face?…. Can we afford a philosophy of change that undervalues time, context, and trust? ”
http://coachm.se/?f=bin%C3%A4r-optionen-erfahrungen&52f=8e binär optionen erfahrungen
Brooking and Eugene Eric Kim are discussing. Toggle Comments
Two quick announcements: First, I’m still on slate for self-organized bootcamp next Monday, April 7 from 4-6pm. The plan is to be in Oakland, but I still need to find a space. More details coming soon.
Second, I’m doing an informal Google Hangout with my friend, Dave Gray, this coming Wednesday, April 2 at 12:30pm. We’re going to be discussing Learning via Artifacts, and we’ll be using Dave’s tool, Boardthing, to take live notes. Everyone is invited to join in on the note-taking! More details at:
Natalie is discussing. Toggle Comments
For those of you who don’t follow tech, there’s a huge debacle that blew up this past week around a company called Github and some very poor gender practices. Summary is here:
The reason I mention it is that some of you have expressed interest in holocracy, and the Github founders had a strong interest in the topic. I roll my eyes whenever I hear this, not because I think holocracy is a bad concept (it’s not, and it’s also a very old one), but because the current groundswell of interest around it feels so naive.
Two friends from Code for America wrote some excellent blog posts on this matter this past weekend:
I wrote my own commentary on this several months ago:
I didn’t mention holocracy by name, but you might notice my subtle references to it in the piece.
Eugene Eric Kim and Rebecca are discussing. Toggle Comments
It was good to see many of you last week. Thanks for letting me join in the fun!
I have a quick question: @brooking and I are working with a network with some pretty deep trust issues. We know that transparency in decision-making and sharing information are going to be essential in building this trust back up. In the mean-time, we were thinking of introducing the concept of “radical transparency” to help this group take a leap of faith and share more honestly and openly than they might otherwise.
So here’s the question: Do you all have any resources on “radical transparency” that you like? I know it’s a framework that’s been percolating, but it’s not one I’ve had a need to access up until now. In this case, I think an established framework, almost a pedagogy, will help them take a leap.
Rebecca and Eugene Eric Kim are discussing. Toggle Comments
I loved yesterday’s bootcamp. I was so happy to see so many of you there, although I missed @anna341bc and @lauren. @marie and @eugenechan, you guys did a great job designing and facilitating, and I liked how you co-facilitated. Would love to see more of that! And @brooking, enjoyed our pair conversations!
I’ve been sitting on, “I matter,” and the more I think about it, the more I like it as a proxy for thinking about aliveness (with @rapetzel‘s objection noted).
Finally, to whomever took pictures of the action, thank you! Was glad to have them, and I even snuck in on a few. I’m assuming it was @eugenechan, but don’t want to make any assumptions! There aren’t any whiteboard pictures there, as I didn’t get them all. Eugene, feel free to upload them to the Google Drive folder, and I can supplement if I have better versions.
Thanks again! I’ll email everyone about April and beyond.
Natalie and Eugene Chan are discussing. Toggle Comments
In the spirit of today’s discussion–being alive can mean doing something that’s very scary and then succeeding!
Eugene Chan and Eugene Eric Kim are discussing. Toggle Comments
I just came across this new report on e-learning: http://leapofreason.org/e-learning-report/ — it’s all about how learning has changed and should continue to change moving forward, with recommendations on what e-learning providers might need to do differently.
As some of you may know, I’m considering going back to graduate school (vs. learning by doing or taking supplementary online courses), and thought this report was both well-informed and timely.
Eugene Chan is discussing. Toggle Comments
Read this article yesterday and thought I’d share it in case some of you may not have seen it. It really validates a lot of what Changemaker Bootcamp is all about. Looking forward to seeing you all soon!
Eugene Eric Kim, marie, and Jessica are discussing. Toggle Comments